For 6 years the Republican controlled congress simply signed a blank check over to little bush with no questions asked. Now that the Democratic controlled congress said NO WAY, the republicans are trying to take credit for it. Its obvious.

Why is it that democrats think being free and equal means that the government provide everyone with everything?? What about the people that dont need or want the help of the government?? Do not they have rights?

It actually looks like they are already.
Is it the Democrats fault whenever a group Republicans do something stupid?
No, I am not saying all Republicans are birthers, but most of the ones on YA seem to be.

The tea party is set on meltdown and if they dont get their way. Look out! These unhinged, slightly retarded people will become like Lenny in Mice and Men. Once it starts it will not stop and end in a frenzy of large proportion.

Haven’t they been benefiting from unions doing the same thing for years? Democrats complain about the Chamber of Commerce running ads but never mention unions running ads for them.

I see the Democrats wanting to strip the insurance companies anti trust status however they are universally opposed to people being able to go across state lines for insurance, which would breed competition, which would naturally lower prices? Why do they not want this?

Those workers have to have a job, have to support their families, they are going where the jobs are and that is not in the US of A. How many people are out of work because the Democrats won’t lift the moratorium on drilling for oil on/in the Gulf Coast waters?

According to Yahoo’s news site, Obama won with 940 popular votes while it took 35,621 popular votes for Huckabee to win. Are the numbers of the democrats actually the number of precincts won? Thanks.

Seriously, how stupid does somebody have to be to believe that the likes of Hillary Clinton are anti-war? Back in 2004, John Kerry ran on a platform that said that Bush had been too soft in the Iraq War, not that the Iraq War was an immoral and illegal, not to mention unnecessary War. Ron Paul followed the Constitution and voted against the Iraq War, while Hillary and the Democrats were voting for it.

Actually, if you look back, the Democrats (and the far-left Trotskyites who call themselves Neo-Cons) were actually the ones who wanted the Iraq War in the first place. If Bush hadn’t attacked Iraq, the Democrats would be attacking him for not having gone after Saddam.

Why is it that people are accusing Ron Paul of adopting the Democrats foreign policy when the reality is that his rivals are the ones who have adopted the Democrats warmongering foreign policy.


[[ Provocateurs Openly Announce Plans To Stage Tea Party Violence ]] Will establishment media take the bait as anarchists pose as racists and extremist right wingers? Paul Joseph Watson www.prisonplanet.com Monday, April 12, 2010 With the establishment desperate to engender and exploit violence which will be used to demonize the Tea Party movement as an extremist mob, so-called anarchists are now openly declaring their intentions to pose as Tea Party members and stage violence in order to discredit populist grass roots organizations. As we warned last week, leading anarchist groups have announced that they plan to crash the nationwide Tea Party protests on April 15, a promise that should not be taken lightly given the proven history of such organizations being infiltrated and steered by authorities to provocateur pointless mayhem and violence that serves as a justification for oppressing peaceful protest groups. Now a new website called crashtheteaparty.org has appeared to act as a forum through which such activity can be planned. The website openly states its mission is to have people infiltrate and pose as Tea Party members and then carry out shameful acts in order to dismantle and demolish the Tea Party. The website is registered to a man named Josh Levin. Whenever possible, we will act on behalf of the Tea Party in ways which exaggerate their least appealing qualities (misspelled protest signs, wild claims in TV interviews, etc.) to further distance them from

 Page 3 of 50 « 1  2  3  4  5 » ...  Last »