An unborn baby has multiplying cells, and so is alive. An unborn baby has unique human DNA and is the product of human conception, and is therefore a unique human. So an unborn baby is a unique human life, not part of the mother. What reason does the democrat party give for unborn babies being denied the right to life since they are clearly a unique human life?

I don’t care about this election. A lot of people say they typically vote Democrat. So what does the democrat party support that 90% of black people like?

A fetus has multiplying cells as so is alive. A fetus has unique human DNA and is the product of human conception, meaning the fetus is not a part of the mother’s body but is a unique human. Thus a fetus is a unique human life. A human baby.

What could be the reason the democrat party says that human baby has no right to live?

Nearly everyone on this site seems to support the Second Amendment (the right to own and use lawful firearms) but many claim to be Democrats, despite the fact that many leaders of the Democrat party have as their top priority the registration and eventual confiscation of all lawful citizens’s personal firearms.
I have been called a liar and challenged to name any leading Democrat who has made it a top priority to register and confiscate legally owned firearms. I will start with Democrat Senator Dianne Feinstien of California who publically stated (and I quote) …"Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in". She is strongly supported in this by Democrat Senators Ted Kennedy, Charles Schumer, Frank Lautenberg, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Al Gore, Hillary Clinton and others. Bill Clinton was the most anti-gun president in American history.
Confiscation HAS followed registration of lawful firearms in many countries, including the UK, Canada and Australia in recent years. California has already declared illegal and confiscated firearms, including the old 10-round semi-automatic SKS rifle, that it had specifically told law-abiding people moving into California that they could continue to own.
The weapons that the Democrat Senators, named above, attempted to make illegal by defining them as "assault weapons" included anything with two features such as a bayonet lug, a threaded muzzle, a pistol grip, or a magazine holding 10 rounds, which would have made many old military-type hunting rifles illegal. Kennedy and Schumer tried to make any cartridge capable of piercing a Kevlar vest illegal, which would have made EVERY hunting rifle illegal. Schumer tried to put a 1000% tax on all ammunition.
To "Tony A": Nobody is "screaming Waco" or "Ruby Ridge", although Janet Reno and Louis Freeh under the Clinton administration did shoot to kill and DID accidentally kill Randy Weaver’s wife at Ruby Ridge, after entrapping Weaver into the alleged "felony" of shortening a gunbarrel for them as a favor, and then had the court give him a bogus trial date that he would miss, enabling them to hunt him down. This was done so they could force him to provide information on another person. They didn’t WANT Weaver.

As for Koresh, he was a nutcase breaking the law, but Janet Reno and Louis Freeh managed to accidentally burn all of his people to death. By the way, there were ten empty special "FBI only" shell cases found in the bunker where sniper Lon Horiuchi (same man who killed Weaver’s wife) was stationed, but the FBI said they never fired a shot. Interesting.

For facts on registration/confiscation, see "2006 Firearms Facts" at nra.com., the best source available anywhere.

Nearly everyone on this site seems to support the Second Amendment (the right to own and use lawful firearms) but many claim to be Democrats, despite the fact that many leaders of the Democrat party have as their top priority the registration and eventual confiscation of all lawful citizens’s personal firearms.
My question has nothing to do with Dick Cheney’s hunting accident.
I do not believe and did not state that all who vote Democrat want to confiscate legal firearms. However, this is and has been a very high priority of Democrat Senators Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, Barbara Boxer, Charles Schumer, John Kerry, Dianne Feinstien and others. Dianne Feinstien once said, and I quote …."Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in". Washinton, D.C. and New York City (both Democrat strongholds) have long ago declared many personal firearms illegal and the State of California (another) is beginning to do the same.

*********************************************************************

Since the Progressives had taken over the Democrat Party and have gotten so far away from their platform?

And since there are so many Socialists and Communists surrounding our chief executive, what are your predictions of the eventual outcome of the Democrat Party?

*************************************************************

I am not talking about the democrat party of old during JFK, I mean the one today. Things do change, such as the slave owner party of choice was the democrat party… Today, the democrat party has completed change and has now entered into the realm of mutation.
.

Or were they always socialists?

I do recall that the Democrat Party was the party of "no" when it came to Civil Rights Bills.

On CNN, Rep. Michelle Bachman revealed that the Democrat Party is planning on using the unconstitutional "nuclear option" for the first time in history in order to force a government takeover of health care. Can the Supreme Court stop them?

But I’ll bet the Democrat Party wants the Liberals to come back with their votes and donations, for the next election, eh?

Why do the Liberals Bow Down and take Abuse? Do they like it?