What kind of excuses will we hear from liberals when Scott Brown wins the MA Senate special election?

15 Comments

1. Ted Kennedy's Car says:

   August 10, 2011 at 5:00 pm

   Whaaa – no one loves us anymore

   WHaaa – we DEMAND a recount

   Whaaa – this is why we need ACORN

   WHaaa – we suck
2. bobbyrich32 says:

   August 10, 2011 at 5:58 pm

   what like George soros, ACORN and the right wing type of excuses we ALWAYS hear. the left will blame coakley and her poorly run campaign..that’s all. not everyone is as juvenile.
3. Maobama says:

   August 10, 2011 at 6:22 pm

   They’ll blame Bush
4. Blessed Cheesemaker (cancelled) says:

   August 10, 2011 at 7:17 pm

   My excuse will be that republicans like you are doing your best to convince people that the future is doomed. Its not really an excuse, its fact, as we can easily see by your questions and answers.

   My question to you, is will you admit you were wrong if he loses?
5. S H I R A Z says:

   August 10, 2011 at 7:58 pm

   they will blame Bush
6. Al? Rez? says:

   August 10, 2011 at 8:52 pm

   None the best man won
7. UNFROZEN CAVEMAN says:

   August 10, 2011 at 9:27 pm

   THIS WILL BE THE ONLY EXCUSE
   THE STUPID UNEDUCATED MORONIC BOOGER EATING MORONS THAT LISTEN TO FOX NEWS IN THE STATE OF MASS. WERE OUT IN FORCE.

   WHAT WILL BE YOUR EXCUSE WHEN BROWN LOSES
8. portia says:

   August 10, 2011 at 10:00 pm

   The answer above is great, T.K. car
9. ken s in area 51 says:

   August 10, 2011 at 10:45 pm

   Just have to hope they do not do recount after recount like they did for Al Frankin they kept recounting until Frankin won.

   I guess we will see if Coakley or any people bring out ballots from car trunks and where ever they can dig them up.
10. Lady Wildcat says:

    August 10, 2011 at 10:53 pm

    According to liberals, every time a liberal loses an election, it’s because the election was “stolen.”
    .
11. trippsmith485 says:

    August 10, 2011 at 11:33 pm

    They are already trying to find ways to cram healthcare thru before he gets a chance to cast his vote.
12. Kevin S says:

    August 10, 2011 at 11:58 pm

    suddenly thousands and thousands of absentee ballots are going to be “found” in a desk, and would u believe all these “absentee ballots ” are going to be for coakley.

    wink wink nudge nudge
13. RBLibertarian says:

    August 11, 2011 at 12:52 am

    It will be Bush’s fault!!!!!!
14. daddeo01905 says:

    August 11, 2011 at 1:44 am

    The excuse will be; “We f__ed up by changing the senate selection process in 2004″.

    We here in Massachusetts are not as partisan or liberal as you the media would have you think.

    There was anger brewing in Massachusetts at the politicians who acted as if they did not have to lesson to the common person, the working class. This anger was brewing before Obama was elected. It had to do with simple things like proposals to raise toll fees form $3.50 to $7.00. Or giving illegal immigrates drivers licenses, reduced tuition, and the right to vote.

    But the biggest thing was the way the this special election was set in motion in 2005. By manipulating the senate selection process in 2005, the choice of senator was taken away from the Governor (Mitt Romney), and given to the people. So the democrats played partisan games, and it backfired. They tried to cheat the republican and ended up cheating themselves.

    {Appointment
    In 2004, the Massachusetts General Court withdrew the authority of the governor to fill a U.S. Senate vacancy by appointment, to prevent the then-Governor Mitt Romney, a Republican, from appointing a Republican to fill the remainder of Democrat John Kerry’s Senate term, if Kerry were to win the 2004 presidential election. The legislation was enacted over Romney’s veto.[17][18][19][20][21] At that time, Senator Ted Kennedy successfully made personal appeals to Massachusetts Democratic legislative leaders to pass the bill, which had been stalled prior to his request.[22]

    Seven days before his death, Kennedy communicated his desire to amend the law so that upon a vacancy, the governor might appoint a Senator to serve until the special election occurred and avoid a five-month vacancy for the office. Kennedy sent a letter to the governor and legislative leaders (received on August 18, 2009, and dated July 2, 2009) requesting that they consider changing the law, and that the Governor obtain the personal pledge of such an appointee to not become a candidate in the following special election.[23][24] John Kerry, President Barack Obama and State House Speaker Robert DeLeo all expressed support for an interim appointment.[25][26][27]}
15. optical illusion says:

    August 11, 2011 at 2:24 am

    The signs had been there. In the bluest of blue states, the election was seen as a referendum on Obama’s policies. Tonight the taxpayers of Massachusetts voted and they voted for America, the Constitution, freedom, smaller government, less spending, NO Health Care Bill and against the Democratic majority that had controlled two of three branches of government for a year.

    Liberals could agree on the obvious: Somebody had taken the seat for granted, had underestimated the public’s anger over the economy, over the Democrats’ health care overhaul, over the plain old arrogance in Washington..

    Brown outperformed analysts expectations and took unexpected leads in areas such as Dartmouth, Massachusetts, where Brown was projected to need 49 percent of the vote to win, but got 53 percent. Sixty-three percent of the heavily liberal Boston area swung for Coakley — an astonishingly low margin.

    This just in Coakley loses because of bad weather caused by Global warming! o_O