From what I’ve seen, Paul makes Palin look like Einstein, and Palin makes Bush actually look SMART. What IS it with people these days, that they are willing to settle for “leaders” like that????
rand paul is not bought and paid for like bush, palin obama clinton, he has a platform of principals that is constant and the media has misrepresented his position on the civil rights bill. He points out correctly that there are contradictions of liberties in the bill…but has stated he would have signed the bill…his position was to untangle the conflicting freedoms. The Federal reserve created in 1913 through the private banks its founders owned bought the 20 largest newspapers in the country and with control of the media has been able to decide who runs for both parties. The CFR Bildrberger and the Tri lateral commission are made up of republican and democrats….very few get anywhere apart from these groups. Rand Paul is an outsider and a threat because his platform is a different agenda. Think for a second how could Bush and Obama both want Ben Berneke to run the Fed? It is more likely the fed picks the president than the president picks the head of the fed.
I think Paul is a philosopher, not a pragmatist. That’s his problem. It’s all well and good to debate government intervention in an abstract sense, but when it comes to practical matters, the fact is that many private owners of businesses would be more than happy to restrict minorities from utilizing their establishments, thus making government intervention necessary in order to provide equal rights for all.
Paul, in my personal opinion, would make a better professor, than politician.
As for Palin, she’s a plastic bag, and Bush took orders from President Cheney.
This is not a political forum.
Putting any of these people in the same sentence with intelligence is just plain wrong.
Bush wasn’t a thick as he looked (unfortunately), look how much he managed to get away with. Oh, and why is this in R&S?
Neither stupid nor insane, he just believes in a certain (bad) theory of justice; he is a Libertarian of an extreme (and consistent) type.
From what I’ve seen, Paul makes Palin look like Einstein, and Palin makes Bush actually look SMART. What IS it with people these days, that they are willing to settle for “leaders” like that????
One step ahead of obama as he needs everything spoon fed to him by teleprompter.
rand paul is not bought and paid for like bush, palin obama clinton, he has a platform of principals that is constant and the media has misrepresented his position on the civil rights bill. He points out correctly that there are contradictions of liberties in the bill…but has stated he would have signed the bill…his position was to untangle the conflicting freedoms. The Federal reserve created in 1913 through the private banks its founders owned bought the 20 largest newspapers in the country and with control of the media has been able to decide who runs for both parties. The CFR Bildrberger and the Tri lateral commission are made up of republican and democrats….very few get anywhere apart from these groups. Rand Paul is an outsider and a threat because his platform is a different agenda. Think for a second how could Bush and Obama both want Ben Berneke to run the Fed? It is more likely the fed picks the president than the president picks the head of the fed.
I think Paul is a philosopher, not a pragmatist. That’s his problem. It’s all well and good to debate government intervention in an abstract sense, but when it comes to practical matters, the fact is that many private owners of businesses would be more than happy to restrict minorities from utilizing their establishments, thus making government intervention necessary in order to provide equal rights for all.
Paul, in my personal opinion, would make a better professor, than politician.
As for Palin, she’s a plastic bag, and Bush took orders from President Cheney.
Palin is actually dumber than Bush, I think. Paul is dumb but not as much as those 2.
1. Paul
2. Bush
3. Palin
Yes