Boot on head, isn’t restraining, it’s being aggressive in turn. Also shut up, you’d crow about it if it was left wing person doing it a right wing. Funny how hypocritical politics has become.
Funny how the Libs act as if they are all offended and try and blow it up to something its not but they were all quite when those SEIU(Libs) beat up that black Conservative for passing out don’t tread on me shirts during the 08 election. Talk about being hypocrites.
Yeah nobody mentioned the restraining part. The heal to the head after she is subdued is gonna get the criticism every time. Of course nobody had a damn thing to say on the left when the SEIU thugs hospitalized the guy in St. Louis for selling “Don’t tread on me” buttons.
Even still, the heal to the head was uncalled for.
She didn’t, and the girl isn’t a commie, and if she were that still wouldn’t justify assault.
If they were worried about Paul for some reason, then they should have had a cordon so no one could get close, instead his window was open, and they recognized her from other rallies, so they knew she wasn’t violent.
Then there is the fact that the girl was on the ground, curled up, when the guy went over and stomped her.
He didn’t restrain her, and the others tackled her and had her on the ground already when he stomped her.
Brave move.
Isn’t it just possible, that the guy was wrong to do that, all on his own? That making excuses, just comes off as if you are looking to excuse what would have been unreasonable force if a cop did it?
And when a private citizen does it, its assault.
Remember what your mom used to tell you?
That it doesn’t matter what someone else did, you know better?
I agree, “what-ifs” don’t count. Why? Because the government takes this argument to strip the people from their rights. Airport body scanners for instance: The government presumes (or uses the “what-if” scenario) you are a terrorist so they scan your image to remove that presumption ( what-if he has a bomb, a gun, a knife, etc.). No proof, guilty until proven innocent.
I have heard about this incident but I didn’t see the video yet. Now I believe they should have restrained her, boot on the head went too far and should be condemned.
They did the right thing. She assaulted Mr. Paul. The bodyguards stopped her from also battering him. She easily could have had a gun.
Lesson: you don’t bum rush someone without getting stomped.
Boot on head, isn’t restraining, it’s being aggressive in turn. Also shut up, you’d crow about it if it was left wing person doing it a right wing. Funny how hypocritical politics has become.
yeah, what if she was a terrorist? what ifs dont count..a mob of a hole men beat up a girl for a sign
PERIOD
they’re cowards
What if, what if, what if??????????
Don’t you guys ever get tired of the hypotheticals?
Really, it’s getting so old.
Right. But it doesn’t suit the left’s purposes todeal with the realities.
She didn’t. But if she did, the guys wouldn’t of stomped her. She was defenseless that’s why they handled her the way they did. Cowards.
Funny how the Libs act as if they are all offended and try and blow it up to something its not but they were all quite when those SEIU(Libs) beat up that black Conservative for passing out don’t tread on me shirts during the 08 election. Talk about being hypocrites.
Yeah nobody mentioned the restraining part. The heal to the head after she is subdued is gonna get the criticism every time. Of course nobody had a damn thing to say on the left when the SEIU thugs hospitalized the guy in St. Louis for selling “Don’t tread on me” buttons.
Even still, the heal to the head was uncalled for.
She didn’t, and the girl isn’t a commie, and if she were that still wouldn’t justify assault.
If they were worried about Paul for some reason, then they should have had a cordon so no one could get close, instead his window was open, and they recognized her from other rallies, so they knew she wasn’t violent.
Then there is the fact that the girl was on the ground, curled up, when the guy went over and stomped her.
He didn’t restrain her, and the others tackled her and had her on the ground already when he stomped her.
Brave move.
Isn’t it just possible, that the guy was wrong to do that, all on his own? That making excuses, just comes off as if you are looking to excuse what would have been unreasonable force if a cop did it?
And when a private citizen does it, its assault.
Remember what your mom used to tell you?
That it doesn’t matter what someone else did, you know better?
notice the smile on her face during this incident
I have been asking that same question!
Also: Why did she lie to the police about her identity and address just after it happened?
Why did she give at least 2 different stories about what occurred, neither of which match what the video showed leading up to her being restrained?
Why did she have a wig?
Why is she SMILING as she went down, if she really thought she was in danger? Look at the video in slow motion showing this!
Why is she smirking when the media was asking her questions?
But she DIDN’T.
I agree, “what-ifs” don’t count. Why? Because the government takes this argument to strip the people from their rights. Airport body scanners for instance: The government presumes (or uses the “what-if” scenario) you are a terrorist so they scan your image to remove that presumption ( what-if he has a bomb, a gun, a knife, etc.). No proof, guilty until proven innocent.
I have heard about this incident but I didn’t see the video yet. Now I believe they should have restrained her, boot on the head went too far and should be condemned.