Dont Talk to Police
An law school professor and former criminal defense attorney tells you why you should never agree to be interviewed by the police. 031408_DontTalktoPolice.wmv
An law school professor and former criminal defense attorney tells you why you should never agree to be interviewed by the police. 031408_DontTalktoPolice.wmv
@IxAnonymousxIo: Firstly I did devise my original statement to look this lawyer and one does not need to insult people for being American as being American is already insulting enough.
So does he mean even when you get pulled over?
@mewrox99 so does he mean even when you get pulled over?
Bless America
Christian University.
@FireEyedMaidOfWar
What the FUCK are you on about? Solder? Was you even watching the vid. He’s a former defense attorney and is currently a professor.
And for your most recent comment:
It seems to me from what I read. That you are in fact, mad. So tell me something…
ARE U MAD BRAH?
Oh it doesn’t make you look intelligent for basically insult him for being an American….BRAH
@morganon13: No chance, American bed-wetting type. I burst my pimples at you and call your law schools a silly thing, you tiny-brained wipers of other people’s bottoms! Yes, depart a lot at this time, and cut the approaching any more or we fire arrows at the top of your head and make castanets out of your testicles already! Ha ha haaa ha! And now, remain gone, illegitimate-faced bugger-folk! And, if you think you got a nasty taunting this time, you ain’t heard nothing yet, dappy American!
@ramv36: More matter, with less art.
@skilly123: And therefore does not enjoy the grace of Shakespeare, as the poet once said: “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” – so he may have to talk to the police pretty soon in order to get rescued from the fanatical votaries of Shakespeare!
@ThreeChe Yes and LE as well. I get pissed off at the cops that try to abuse the power or deny people their rights. Every American should know their constitutional rights and I make sure whenever I deal with people they are fully informed.
@TechnoL33T No, entrapment is when a cop calls you up because you have sympathies with x group and says hey bro I got some c-4 you wanna blow stuff up? LE (Law Enforcement) can’t initiate a crime like that. Now if you come to an undercover officer thinking they are an x supporter and ask them if they could you get explosives they can say yes and that won’t be entrapment. Following a person who you have a gut feeling is suspicious until they break traffic law is not entrapment.
@TechnoL33T No, entrapment is when a cop calls you up because you have sympathies with x group and says hey bro I got some c-4 you wanna blow stuff up? LE (Law Enforcement) can’t initiate a crime like that. Now if you come to an undercover officer thinking they are an x supporter and ask them if they could you get explosives they can say yes and that won’t be entrapment. Following a person who you have a gut feeling is suspicious until they break traffic law is not entrapment.
He can NOT follow someone until they inevitably do something he can pull them over for; at least not in my state. If a police officer follows you for more than 3 city blocks, you can prosecute him for entrapment.
@boydrewboy The government did this to people during Katrina. We need some lawyers to go down there and sue the holly fuck shit out of the government for what they have done.
@MrAppleseed88 There’s no amendment that states guns may be taken away during any circumstances.
If you can say you have a right not to talk to a cop, then do you think the government should take away peoples guns for no reason during emergencies?
@FireEyedMaidOfWar Who the hell are you and what did you think you were watching? Did your meds wear off? It’s not Patton or McHale’s Navy. It’s a law school lecture, Red Sonja. Not everyone is the big burly barbarian of your rape fantasies, darling.
Who is the professor?
That quiz at the beginning was hard as fuck.
@levoices That’s interesting, thanks for the info. Are you a law student? I want to learn more about this, but apparently Wikipedia doesn’t cut it when it comes to current or highly contested issues.
@Balancedcitizen ‘police’ and ‘nothing to worry about’ NEVER NEVER NEVER belong in the same sentence!
Last time I had a flat tire on the side of the road a city cop stopped to check on me. When he ran my license plates, he transposed one of the numbers. The wrong plate number came back as STOLEN. I got cuffed, apprised of the situation, then told him he was wrong, which he denied, until he saw that he DID run the wrong number.
His mistake put me in cuffs despite complete innocence. Remember that
@FireEyedMaidOfWar and?
The Miranda v Raffel thing is wrong. Whoever wrote the wikipedia article doesn’t know what they are talking about. You can at any time revoke authorization you granted the police to search your property. They can get a warrant though. You can also at any time request a lawyer to be present at your interrogation even after saying you didn’t want one. Raffel volunteered to go on the witness stand at his second trial. His lack of prior testimony may have hurt him and caused his guilty verdict.
Neat
@FireEyedMaidOfWar He’s a lawyer.