Republican New Hampshire Debate part.2

25 Comments

1. adventuregamer1 says:

   July 12, 2011 at 2:20 pm

   Does this make it right to do it again?
2. orrangeo says:

   July 12, 2011 at 2:57 pm

   Lincoln suspended Habeas corpus
   FDR approved the Japanese internment camps
   The suspension of freedoms is always wrong, but we have made this mistake before.
3. Tzakuraba says:

   July 12, 2011 at 3:28 pm

   Everyone with the exception of Ron Paul, needs get their tongue out of eachothers ass.

   McCain, Romney and juliana r like windup dolls singing the same effing song!
4. xms32 says:

   July 12, 2011 at 4:07 pm

   About the same response that everybody here has when you open your fat retarded mouth.
5. 9winDuDown9 says:

   July 12, 2011 at 4:32 pm

   i would like to see them all agree on somthing please tell me that there all in agreence with somthing because i havint seen it myself that will be good for all americans<
6. xRonPaul2008x says:

   July 12, 2011 at 4:37 pm

   Everyone text R4 to 36288 on your cell now!

   Show FOX NEWS that Ron Paul won !
7. DGB85 says:

   July 12, 2011 at 5:29 pm

   “Which one”.
8. HibikiTehMan says:

   July 12, 2011 at 6:17 pm

   Let’s see a third world country that has little money with an unstable economy is a threat to America? Well hell if all it takes to screw up our entire government and our society is two big buildings then damn we are screwed. Might as well bomb every fucking nation out there then huh, because America is so vulnerable and unable to sustain itself anymore.
9. HibikiTehMan says:

   July 12, 2011 at 6:19 pm

   Real shit. Paul seems to actually want to at least have real legit reasons to start a war and openly says why we are there and how it isn’t right.

   Even if people think he is siding with the “terrorists” it is obvious that he understand why they are protecting their country and that we should not try to force people to live our way.
10. mikej971 says:

    July 12, 2011 at 6:22 pm

    Maverick, that’s not what you said. And your modified view isn’t any better. Saying someone’s words are stupid doesn’t mean anything to rational people. There’s no substance to what is said. Why are his words stupid?
11. mikej971 says:

    July 12, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    99.9% of Paulistineans(Ron Paul supporters??) havn’t read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights…hmmm so the history papers you write are based on what you want to be true so you can argue you point….and not on real facts that have been proven. It seems that your mind is the one that is too lazy and weak to be of any use.
12. Maverick7799 says:

    July 12, 2011 at 6:45 pm

    No, i base my understanding of Ron Paul off the words that come out of his mouth and how stupid they are.
13. mikej971 says:

    July 12, 2011 at 6:47 pm

    Why does it matter what the other candidates think?

    They laugh because they want you to think Ron Paul is a loser. You allow them to mold your mind. Instead of seriously questioning what the candidates stand for, you base your understanding of Ron Paul off of the body language of the people running against him. Smart.
14. Maverick7799 says:

    July 12, 2011 at 6:50 pm

    why is Ron Paul even up there….. when he opens his mouth all the other candidates just look at him like “what the hell are you talking about”
15. ToadkillerDog says:

    July 12, 2011 at 7:15 pm

    Since you were civil, I’ll answer but you’ll need to come down off of your soap box. If you understand who most RP supporters are, you won’t expect rationality. It amuses me to be corrected by people that make far more errors in their writing than I. The knee-jerk response is to play the, “you’re too stupid to understand” card. It’s the lazy tool of weak minds.

    I have a history degree and, unlike 99.9% of the Paulistineans, I’ve read the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
16. SW34R3NG3N says:

    July 12, 2011 at 7:53 pm

    Wrong approach IMO. Why be so antagonistic? Even if you see Paul as wrong (as I do on several key points) why feed into the name-calling. I’m not sure if I even disagree so much as find some of his ideas a bit too nebulous to pin down.

    It seems that most of the candidates on either side really believe that their cause is just and they’re the person for the job. I wish they would make their respective cases instead of attempting punchlines.
17. SW34R3NG3N says:

    July 12, 2011 at 8:43 pm

    I don’t support Paul but I think he’s an important candidate. No, he won’t be nominated but his support is vigorous and he raises a lot of money. He’s connecting with a lot of people in a very significant way. The party would do well to at least take note.

    Super Tuesday is still a month out and I’m still undecided as to whom to vote for in the primary. This was a very good debate and now I can safely say it won’t be Paul or Huckabee. No disrespect to either man.
18. ToadkillerDog says:

    July 12, 2011 at 8:51 pm

    “dude,” “must’ve,” LMAO, keep ‘em coming. Paulistineans are such easy targets.

    Yep, I did mean ‘throw.’ There are a few spelling and punctuation mistakes; I occasionally get lazy. I’m educated, that means little these days.

    Paul understands our history and the history of the Middle East so very poorly. How many of you are ‘Truther’ asshats?
19. arenaskies says:

    July 12, 2011 at 9:38 pm

    rakura- what the hell is a third world country going to impose threats for? they need to focus on their nation before others, only if anther country threatens THEIRS (I think it’s pretty obvious who), then they fight back. Oh yes, I’ll give you a break though. Third world countries are a threat, but they’re just trying to defend their country.
20. arenaskies says:

    July 12, 2011 at 9:47 pm

    ToadkillerDog- When Paul said “I don’t understand this”, he meant “How stupid can the Bush Doctrine be?” Only an idiot like you wouldn’t understand what he truly meant, don’t give that average college-age smart ass comment because apparently you must’ve never went to college.
21. nyczst0rm says:

    July 12, 2011 at 9:51 pm

    toadkillerdog – i think you meant “throw” in the word dude. ill leave the other spelling and grammar errors alone. looks like someone isnt intelligent as your average college-age smartass, whatever the hell that is. i think you meant college students and as for them being smart..well, theyre in college. i understand now why, what ron paul says flies over your head, which in turn makes you dislike the guy, youre just not bright. =)
22. zomgpewpews says:

    July 12, 2011 at 10:13 pm

    The UN wasn’t founded until AFTER WWII. Read a book
23. forrestlyone says:

    July 12, 2011 at 11:10 pm

    Ron Paul is right. Even though it is true that some militants will hate us and want to hurt us no matter what, Getting out of the Middle East and and ending these useless pro-active wars certainly will not hurt anything…it can only help create a safer country.
24. coultrane says:

    July 12, 2011 at 11:18 pm

    Rudy is a giggling, little cross dressing, theiving bitch.
25. hilgerst says:

    July 12, 2011 at 11:42 pm

    a prime example of American orientalism